Response of the rhizosphere microbial community of phytoremediation plants to oil pollution and the application of biopreparations

The present study aims to evaluate microbiological activity in the rhizosphere of plants growing under oil pollution conditions and in the presence of biopreparations having a different spectrum of action. Common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) were selected as phytoremediation plants. The soil was treated with the hydrocarbon-oxidizing preparation “Lenoil” and two preparations of nonspecific action having a growth-stimulating effect: “Elena” and “Azolen”. A soil pollutant concentration of 4% was selected for conducting plant-based bioremediation. The study showed a slight increase in the total microbial count and the microscopic fungi count in the rhizosphere of plants due to pollution, while indicating a decrease in the count of amino-autotrophs and cellulolytics. The introduction of non-specific biopreparations into the soil promoted the growth of destructive microorganisms despite the fact that microorganisms in the preparations are not designed for soil detoxification and decontamination. Under the effect of biopreparations, the rhizosphere of sunflower and wheatgrass plants exhibited an increase or stabilization of microbiological activity, which may indicate their positive effect on microbiological processes occurring in contaminated soil. The rhizosphere of Agropyron cristatum L. plants generally provided a more favorable environment for the development of such groups of bacteria as amino-autotrophs, cellulolytics, micromycetes, and hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria. Of the studied variants of soil treatment with biopreparations for phytoremediation purposes, it is recommended to combine the application of the “Lenoil” biopreparation and the planting of phytoremediation plants in oil-contaminated soil.

1. Melekhina E.N., Kanev V.A., Markarova M.Yu., Nadezhkin S.M., Nowakowski A.B., Taskaeva A.A., et al. Assessment of the state of oil-polluted ecosystems of European Subarctic: a multidisciplinary approach. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya = Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2020;2:123-129. (In Russian).DOI: 10.25750/1995-4301-2020-2-123-129. EDN: WWQBYT.

2. Ryabukhina M.V., Filippova A.V., Ryabinina Z.N. Phytomonitoring of areas of oil-and-gas production boring wells of the Romanovsky oil field in Orenburg Region. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015;6:202-204. (In Russian). EDN: VDOOVB.

3. Shi L., Liu Z., Yang L., Fan W. Effects of oil pollution on soil microbial diversity in the Loess hilly areas, China. Annals of Microbiology. 2022;72:26. DOI: 10.1186/s13213-022-01683-7.

4. Loginov O.N., Silishchev N.N., Boiko T.F., Galimzyanova N.F. Bioremediation: microbiological technologies for cleaning oil-contaminated soils and industrial waste. Moscow: Nauka; 2009, 111 p. (In Russian). EDN: QLAIWR.

5. Korshunova T.Y., Chetverikov S.P., Bakaeva M.D., Kuzina E.V., Rafikova G.F., Chetverikova D.V., et al. Microorganisms in the elimination of oil pollution consequences (review). Prikladnaya biokhimiya i mikrobiologiya. 2019;55(4):338-349. (In Russian). DOI: 10.1134/S0555109919040093. EDN: HNVRQU.

6. Wang A., Fu W., Feng Y., Liu Z., Song D. Synergetic ef-fects of microbial-phytoremediation reshape microbial communities and improve degradation of petroleum contaminants. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;429:128396. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128396.

7. Merkl N., Schultze-Kraft R., Infante С. Phytore-mediation in the tropics – influence of heavy crude oil on root morphological characteristics of graminoids. Environmental Pollution. 2005;138(1):86-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.02.023.

8. Kechavarzi C., Pettersson K., Leeds-Harrison P., Ritchie L., Ledin S. Root establishment of perennial ryegrass (L. perenne) in diesel contaminated surface soil layers. Environmental Pollution. 2007;145(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.039.

9. Turkovskaya O.V., Pozdnyakova N.N., Muratova A.Yu., Dubrovskaya E.V., Golubev S.N. Potential of plants and microorganisms to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biomika = Biomics. 2018;10(2):193-201. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2018-27. EDN: XVBOHZ.

10. Kafle A., Timilsina A., Gautam A., Adhikari K., Bhattarai A., Aryal N. Phytoremediation: mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environmental Advances. 2022;8:100203. DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203.

11. Kireeva N.A., Grigoriadi A.S., Bagautdinov F.Ya. Phy-toremediation as a way to purificating soils contaminated with heavy metals. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekolo- giya = Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2011;3:4–10. (In Russian). EDN: OOFKOH.

12. Derevyannikova M.V. The study of the crested wheat grass collection (Agropyron рectiniforme) on winter hardness and energy of spring aftergrowing of grass in the Stavropol territory. Sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal = Agricultural Journal. 2020;5:30-36. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25930/2687-1254/005.5.13.2020. EDN: XKDIKJ.

13. Korshunova T.Yu., Loginov O.N. Toxicological assessment of bio preparation oildestructor «Lenoil»® – NORD, SHP. Toksikologicheskii vestnik = Toxicological Review. 2017;(3):58-60. (In Russian). DOI: 10.36946/0869-7922-2017-3-58-60. EDN: ZAGZJT.

14. Kireeva N.A., Rafikova G.F., Galimzyanova N.F., Loginov O.N., Grigoriadi A.S., Yakupova A.B. Influence of biofungicide Elena on micromycetes complexes of oil-polluted soils under bioremediation. Mikologiya i Fitopatologiya = Mycology and Phytopathology. (In Russian). 2010;44(1):53-62. EDN: OIYKXZ.

15. Ugrekhelidze D.Sh., Durmishidze S.V. Intake and detoxification of organic xenobiotics in plants. Tbilisi: Metsniereba; 1984, 230 p. (In Russian).

16. Talaibekova G.T., Kozhobaev K.A., Tokpaieva J.K., Esenzhanova G.K., Totubaeva N.E. Phytotesting of oil-contaminated soils using phytotolerant plants. Problemy regional'noi ekologii = Regional Environmental Issues. 2019;2:20-24. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/1728323X-2019-12020. EDN: MVBVAX.

17. Da Silva Correa H., Maranho L.T. The potential association of Echinochloa polystachya (Kunth) Hitchc. with bacterial consortium for petroleum degradation in contaminated soil. SN Applied Sciences. 2021;3:80. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-04070-6.

18. Athar H.-R., Ambreen S., Javed M., Hina M., Rasul S., Zafar Z.U., et al. Influence of sub-lethal crude oil concentration on growth, water relations and photosynthetic capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016;23:18320-18331. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6976-7.

19. Sotnikova YU.M., Grigoriadi A.S., Fedyaev V.V., Garipova M.I., Farkhutdinov R.G. The effect’s evaluation of biological products on the morphometric and physiological parameters of plants-remediants in conditions of soil oil pollution. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Estestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Natural sciences. 2022;1:51-63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21685/23079150-2022-1-5. EDN: QYJLLE.

20. Kitamura R.S.A., Maranho L.T. Phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons-contaminated soil using Desmodium incanum DC., Fabaceae. Revista Latinoamericana de Biotecnología Ambiental y Algal. 2016;7(1). DOI: 10.7603/s40682-016-0001-1.

21. Kuzina E.V., Rafikova G.F., Stolyarova E.A., Logi- nov O.N. Efficiency of associations of legume plants and growth-stimulating bacteriafor restoration of oil-contaminated soils. Agrokhimiya. 2021;4:87-96. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0002188121040074. EDN: AMIIYV.

22. Pikovskii Yu.I. Natural and technogenic flows of hydrocarbons in the environment. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University; 1993, 206 p. (In Russian).

23. Panasov M.N., Denisov E.P., Upolovnikov D.A., Denisov K.Yu., Mars A.M. Zhitnyak as an effective phytomeliorant in the dry steppe Trans-Volga. Niva Povolzh'ya. 2008;3:47-54. (In Russian). EDN: JSILIF.

24. Chaudhary D.K., Bajagain R., Jeong S.-W., Kim J. Development of a bacterial consortium comprising oil-degraders and diazotrophic bacteria for elimination of exogenous nitrogen requirement in bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;35:99. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2674-1.

25. Enkina O.V. Korobskii N.F. Microbiological aspects of preserving the fertility of Kuban chernozem. Krasnodar: Agroprompoligrafist; 1999, 150 p. (In Russian).

26. Kolesnikov S.I., Kazeev K.Sh., Veligonova N.V., Patrusheva E.V., Aznaur’yan D.K., Val’kov V.F. Changes in the complex of soil microorganisms in ordinary chernozem contaminated with oil and oil products. Agrokhimiya. 2007;12:44-48. (In Russian). EDN: IBJUID.

27. Terekhova V.A. Micromycetes in ecological evaluation of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Moscow: Nauka; 2007, 214 p. (In Russian).

28. Liu Q., Tang J., Liu X., Song B., Zhen M., Ashbolt N.J. Vertical response of microbial community and degrading genes to petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in saline alkaline soil. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2019;81:80-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.02.001.