Comparative evaluation of enzyme cocktails for conversion of pretreated oat hulls
https://doi.org/10.21285/achb.990
EDN: BJADRE
Abstract
The enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic feedstock is a critical step in the production of value-added biosynthesis products. This work presents a comparative evaluation of commercial enzyme preparations and their combinations for converting oat hulls following nitric acid pretreatment. Hydrolysis was carried out at an initial substrate concentration of 30 g/L, pH 4.7, and a temperature of (46±2) °C. The study evaluated three enzyme preparations from different manufacturers, including Agrocell Plus (Agroferment LLC, Russia), Cellolux-A (Sibbiofarm LLC, Russia), and Ultraflo Max (Novozymes A/S, Denmark). The evaluation of the individual preparations revealed that the yield of reducing substances from the substrate mass was 53%, 40%, and 51%, respectively. The addition of supplementary β-glucanase (Ultraflo Max) to the enzyme preparations Agrocell Plus or Cellolux-A, which exhibit high cellulase activity, resulted in a 1.3–1.5-fold increase in reducing substance yield. The maximum yield of reducing substances of 72%, corresponding to 99% hydrolysis of the available substrate portion, was observed during hydrolysis using a combination of all three enzyme preparations. Scanning electron microscopy of the substrate before and after hydrolysis confirmed the effectiveness of the mixed preparations and revealed a difference in the residual fragmented substrate after hydrolysis by the individual preparations versus the multi-enzyme compositions, in favor of the latter. All hydrolysates obtained from the nitric acid-pretreated oat hulls were characterized as glucose-based, with the total concentration of glucose amounting to 85–91%. This composition suggests a high potential for successful use in subsequent biosynthesis processes.
About the Authors
E. I. KashcheyevaRussian Federation
Ekaterina I. Kashcheyeva, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Senior Researcher
1, Sotsialisticheskaya St., Biysk, 659322
V. V. Budaeva
Russian Federation
Vera V. Budaeva, Cand. Sci. (Chemistry), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory, Leading Researcher
1, Sotsialisticheskaya St., Biysk, 659322
V. N. Zolotukhin
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Zolotukhin, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Senior Researcher
1, Sotsialisticheskaya St., Biysk, 659322
References
1. Tuan L., Anne-Archard D., Cameleyre X., Lombard E., To K.A., Pham T.A., et al. Rheological investigation of complex lignocellulosic suspensions during hydrolysis using pure and cocktail of enzymes. Bioresource Technology. 2025;426:132333. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132333.
2. Moya E.B., Syhler B., Dragone G., Mussatto S.I. Tailoring a cellulolytic enzyme cocktail for efficient hydrolysis of mildly pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2024;175:110403. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2024.110403.
3. Yamakawa C.K., Qin F., Mussatto S.I. Advances and opportunities in biomass conversion technologies and biorefineries for the development of a bio-based economy. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2018;119:54-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.09.007.
4. Liang C., Long Y., Wang W., Zhang Y., Xing S., Chen Z., et al. Correlation and synergy between fungal secretome cellulolytic enzyme cocktails and commercial cellulase for woody biomass degradation. Renewable Energy. 2025;240:122158. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.122158.
5. Semenova M.V., Rozhkova A.M., Osipov D.O., Telitsin V.D., Rubtsova E.A., Kondrat’eva E.G., et al. Methods for preprocessing reeds to obtain enzymatic hydrolysates with a high sugar content. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2024;60:931-941. DOI: 10.1134/S0003683824604736.
6. Mankar A.R., Pandey A., Modak A., Pant K.K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review on recent advances. Bioresource Technology. 2021;334:125235. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125235.
7. Petukhova O.S., Pristavka A.A., Pristavka E.A., Gavrikov D.E., Salovarova V.P. Comparative analysis of the structural and functional features of endoglucanases with different temperature optima. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2024;14(4):596-604. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21285/achb.946. EDN: SRPVFQ.
8. Adsul M., Sandhu S.K., Singhania R.R., Gupta R., Puri S.K., Mathur A. Designing a cellulolytic enzyme cocktail for the efficient and economical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2020;133:109442. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.109442.
9. Agrawal R., Satlewal A., Gaur R., Mathur A., Kumar R., Gupta R.P., et al. Pilot scale pretreatment of wheat straw and comparative evaluation of commercial enzyme preparations for biomass saccharification and fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2015;102:54-61. DOI: 10.1016/J.BEJ.2015.02.018.
10. Soleimani S., Ranaei-Siadat S.-O., Preparation and optimization of cellulose cocktail to improve the bioethanol process. Biofuels. 2017;8(2):291-296. DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2016.1224293.
11. Shevchenko A.R., Mayorova K.A., Chukhchin D.G., Malkov A.V., Toptunov E.A., Telitsin V. D., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of kraft and sulfite pulps: what is the best cellulosic substrate for industrial saccharification? Fermentation. 2023;9(11):936. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9110936.
12. Serba E.M., Rimareva L.V., Overchenko M.B., Ignatova N.I., Medrish M.E., Pavlova A.A., et al. Selecting multi-enzyme composition and preparation conditions for strong wort. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2021;11(3):384-392. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21285/2227-2925-2021-11-3-384-392. EDN: YEIIZV.
13. Li J., Zhou P., Liu H., Xiong C., Lin J., Xiao W., et al. Synergism of cellulase, xylanase, and pectinase on hydrolyzing sugarcane bagasse resulting from different pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology. 2014;155:258-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.113.
14. Kurschner K., Hoffer A. Cellulose and cellulose derivative. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1993;92:145-154.
15. Pavlov I.N. A setup for studying the biocatalytic conversion of products from the processing of nonwood raw materials. Catalysis in Industry. 2014;6:355-360. DOI: 10.1134/S207005041404014X.
16. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry. 1959;31(3):426-428. DOI: 10.1021/ac60147a030.
17. Dotsenko A., Gusakov A., Rozhkova A., Sinitsyna O., Shashkov I., Sinitsyn A. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials using synthetic mixtures of purified cellulases bioengineered at N-glycosylation sites. 3 Biotech. 2018;8:396. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1419-4.
18. Shi J., Wu Y., Zhang S., Tian Y., Yang D., Jiang Z. Bioinspired construction of multi-enzyme catalytic systems. Chemical Society Reviews. 2018;47(12):4295-4313. DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00914C.
19. Rohrbach J.C., Luterbacher J.S. Investigating the effects of substrate morphology and experimental conditions on the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass through modeling. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts. 2021;14:103. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01920-2.
20. Schläfle S., Tervahartiala T., Senn T., Kölling-Paternoga R. Quantitative and visual analysis of enzymatic lignocellulose degradation. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2017;11:42-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2017.06.002.
21. Zeng M., Mosier N.S., Huang C.-P., Sherman D.M., Ladisch M.R. Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2007;97(2):265-278. DOI: 10.1002/bit.21298.
22. Zemnukhova L.A., Panasenko A.E., Polyakova N.V., Skiba E.A., Budaeva V.V. Composition of inorganic components of oat husks and products of their chemical and enzymatic transformation. Zhurnal prikladnoi khimii. 2018;91(2):217-221. (In Russian). EDN: YRVLZF.
23. Kaur P., Singh S., Sharma N., Agrawal R. Filling in the gaps in second-generation biorefineries: evaluating rice straw and its bioethanol residue for the production of biogenic silica nanoparticles. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering. 2024;9:67-76. DOI: 10.1007/s41204-023-00351-8.
24. Zemnukhova L.A., Egorov A.G., Fedorishcheva G.A., Barinov N.N., Sokol’Nitskaya T.A., Botsul A.I. Properties of amorphous silica produced from rice and oat processing waste. Inorganic Materials. 2006;42:24-29. DOI: 10.1134/S0020168506010067.
25. Prempeh C.O., Formann S., Schliermann T., Dizaji H.B., Nelles M. Extraction and characterization of biogenic silica obtained from selected agro-waste in Africa. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(21):10363. DOI: 10.3390/app112110363.
26. Vistovskaya V.P., Kozhemyakin D.S., Kamenskaya E.P. Optimization of sunflower husk enzymolysisparameters through use of mathematical modeling methods. Polzunovskiy vestnik. 2025;1:103-109. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2025.01.012. EDN: USIKBN.
Review
For citations:
Kashcheyeva E.I., Budaeva V.V., Zolotukhin V.N. Comparative evaluation of enzyme cocktails for conversion of pretreated oat hulls. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/achb.990. EDN: BJADRE