Preview

Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology

Advanced search

Guidelines for using antibodies against dehydrins in agrobiotechnology

https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2019-9-2-277-287

Abstract

Detection of the expression levels of the dehydrin gene in plants is increasingly becoming a widespread technique for testing plant resistance to cold, drought, salinity or high heavy metal concentrations in soils. The simplest way to determine the content of dehydrins consists in using specific antibodies (antibody specificity is critical). The experience of dehydrin detection in various plants provided a basis for this work. In this study, we set out to compare the reactions of antibodies with reactive proteins derived from three most accessible sources, as well as to assess their specificity. The comparability of detected proteins in terms of their quantity and molecular weight was studied for several plants: 1) total and thermostable protein in scots pine needles; 2) mitochondrial protein in peas; 3) total and thermostable protein in winter wheat; 4) total and thermostable protein in arabidopsis. In all the cases, either slight or significant differences in the quantity and molecular weight of the detected protein groups were observed. These differences can be attributed to the three possible reasons: K-segment variability; different carrier proteins used by manufacturers; as well as the presence of shared reactive epitopes in some groups of proteins that are not dehydrins. The analysis of differences in the number of the groups detected using antibodies from different manufacturers reveals their amount to be minimal for cereal plants and becoming larger for dicotyledons and conifers. The largest number of the groups was detected in pea mitochondria. Some of the antibody-binding protein groups are definitely not dehydrins. The abovementioned differences are smaller for thermostable proteins. Thus, obtaining a thermostable protein fraction can be recommended as a simple procedure increasing the dehydrins detection level. The comparison of the dehydrin amounts should not be used as a measure of the relative plant resistance when comparing evolutionarily distant species, since the antibody reactivity to the dehydrins of distant species may differ significantly. At the same time, this method can be used in agrobiology for the molecular-level assessment of the initial or induced resistance of plant varieties (same or related species) to cold, drought, as well as other adverse conditions associated with water deficiency.

About the Authors

G. B. Borovskii
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Biology), Professor, Vice-Director on Science,

Irkutsk



M. V. Ivanova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Ph.D. (Biology), Researcher,

Irkutsk



M. A. Kondakova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Ph.D. (Biology), Leading Engineer,

Irkutsk



N. E. Korotaeva
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Ph.D. (Biology), Senior Researcher,

Irkutsk



G. G. Suvorova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher,

Irkutsk



I. V. Ukolova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher,

Irkutsk



A. V. Fedyaeva
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Ph.D. (Biology), Researcher,

Irkutsk



References

1. Galau G.A., Hughes D.W., Dure L. Abscisic acid induction of cloned cotton late embryogenesisabundant (Lea) mRNAs. Plant Molecular Biology. 1986, vol. 7, issue 3, pp. 155–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021327

2. Thomashow M.F. Plant cold acclimation: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1999, vol. 50, pp. 571–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571

3. Close T.J. Dehydrins: A commonalty in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiologia Plantarum. 1997, vol. 100, pp. 291–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04785.x

4. Hanin M., Brini F.E., Ebel C., Toda Y., Takeda S., Masmoudi K. Plant dehydrins and stress tolerance: Versatile proteins for complex mechanisms. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2011, vol. 6, pp. 1503–1509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/psb. 6.10.17088

5. Graether S.P., Boddington K.F. Disorder and function: a review of the dehydrin protein family. Front Plant Sci. 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00576

6. Banerjee A., Roychoudhury A. Group II late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins: structural and functional aspects in plant abiotic stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 2016, vol. 79, issue 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0113-3

7. Vítámvás P., Kosová K., Musilová J., Holková L., Marík P., Smutná P., Klíma M., Prášil I.T. Relationship Between Dehydrin Accumulation and Winter Survival in Winter Wheat and Barley Grown in the Field. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019, vol. 10, A. 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00007

8. Borovskii G.B., Stupnikova I.V., Peshkova A.A., Dorofeev N.V., Voinikov V.K. Thermostable proteins of seedlings and tillering nodes of winter wheat plants. Fiziologiya rastenii. 1999, vol. 46, pp. 777–783. (In Russian)

9. Stupnikova I.V., Borovskii G.B., Dorofeev N.V., Peshkova A.A., Voinikov V.K. Accumulation and disappearance of dehydrins and sugars depending on freezing tolerance of winter wheat plants at different developmental phases. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2002, vol. 27, pp. 55–60. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00015-8

10. Pomortsev А.V., Dorofeev N.V., Katysheva N.B., Peshkova А.А. Changes in dehydrin composition in winter cereal crowns during winter survival. Biologia Plantarum. 2017, vol. 61, pp. 394–398. DOI: 10.1007/s10535-016-0673-8

11. Yu Zhengyang, Wang Xin, Zhang Linsheng Structural and Functional Dynamics of Dehydrins: A Plant Protector Protein under Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 3420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113420

12. Timmons T.M., Dunbar B.S. Protein blotting and immunodetection. Methods in Enzymology. 1990, vol. 182, pp. 679–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82053-5

13. Weiland G. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)--a new serodiagnostic method for the detection of parasitic infections. Munchener medizinische Wochenschrift. 1978, vol. 120, pp. 1457–1460.

14. Close T.J., Fenton R.D., Moonan F. A view of plant dehydrins using antibodies specific to the carboxyterminal peptide. Plant Molecular Biology. 1993, vol. 23, pp. 279–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029004

15. Korotaeva N.E., Oskorbina M.V., Kopytova L.D., Suvorova G.G., Borovskii G.B., Voinikov V.K. Variations in the content of stress proteins in the needles of common pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) within an annual cycle. Journal of Forest Research. 2012, vol. 17, pp. 89–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-011-0260-y

16. Grabel’nykh. O.I., Pobezhimova T.P., Pavlovskaya N.S., Koroleva N.A., Borovik O.A., Lyubushkina I.V., Voinikov V.K. Antioxidant function of alternative oxidase in mitochondria of winter wheat during cold hardening. Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology. 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 249–257. DOI: 10.1134/ S1990747811040040

17. Bradford M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Analytical biochemistry. 1976, vol. 72, pp. 248–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

18. Jarvis S.B., Taylor M.A., Macleod M.R., Davies H.V. Cloning and Characterisation of the cDNA Clones of three Genes that are differentially Expressed during Dormancy-Breakage in the Seeds of Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Journal of Plant Physiology. 1996, vol. 147, pp. 559–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80046-0


Review

For citations:


Borovskii G.B., Ivanova M.V., Kondakova M.A., Korotaeva N.E., Suvorova G.G., Ukolova I.V., Fedyaeva A.V. Guidelines for using antibodies against dehydrins in agrobiotechnology. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2019;9(2):277-287. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2019-9-2-277-287

Views: 240


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-2925 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1558 (Online)