Effect of nodule and pathogenic bacteria on levels of nitric oxide and cyclic adenosine monophosphate in pea roots at initial stages of interaction
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2020-10-2-294-302
Abstract
A significant role in the initial stages of rhizobial symbiosis formation in pea plants is performed by innate immunity. In this connection, the present study is focused on the concentration dynamics of two signalling molecules – nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) – in the roots of etiolated seedlings of the Pisum sativum L. pea interacting with pathogenic (Pseudomonas syringae pv. Pisi) and nodule (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viceae) bacteria. In time dynamics experiments, an endogenous rhythm of nitric oxide content changes in the root tissues of pea seedlings was characterised by an increase followed by a decrease in the level of nitric oxide and depending on exogenous biotic factors (symbiotic and pathogenic bacteria). Similar fluctuations were also observed when studying the dynamics of cyclic adenosine monophosphate concentration under the influence of the same biotic factors. The observed effects are assumed to be associated with certain exometabolites of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae (Nod-factors) and Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi (cell wall exopolysaccharides) influencing the legume plant and activeting its innate immunity. Moreover, it is feasible that the different dynamics of changes in the studied components of the host plant signalling systems at the initial stages of interaction with symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms have a variegated function: regulatory or protective in cases of symbiosis and pathogenesis, respectively. The observed change in the dynamics of the NO-synthase and adenylate cyclase signalling systems (NO and cAMP) components is assumed to be applied by the host plant as a “code” for transmitting a signal concerning the nature of the operating factor and the generation of corresponding reactions at the molecular level.
About the Authors
A. A. Ishchenko
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Biology), Researcher
132, Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation
N. V. Filinova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Biology), Researcher
132, Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation
A. V. Sidorov
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS;
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Assistant
1, Krasnogo vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Assistant
1, Krasnogo vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation
References
1. Beatly PH, Good AG. Future prospects for cereals that fix nitrogen. Science. 2011;333(6041):416–417. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209467
2. Provorov NA, Vorob'ev NI. Genetic basis of the evolution of plant-microbial symbiosis. St. Petersburg: Inform-Navigator; 2012. 400 p. (In Russian)
3. Kolupaev YuE, Karpets YuV, Yastreb TO, Lugovaya AA. Signal mediators in realization of physiological effects of stress phytohormones. Vestnik Khar'kovskogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universiteta. Seriya Biologiya = The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Biology. 2016;1:42–62. (In Russian)
4. Glyan'ko AK, Ishchenko AA. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as possible mediators of system resistance in fabaceae affected by rhizobial infection. Vestnik Khar'kovskogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universiteta. Seriya Biologiya = The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Biology. 2017;1:9–20. (In Russian)
5. Djordjevic MA, Gabriel DW, Rolfe BG. Rhizobium-The Refined Parasite of Legumes. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1987;25:145–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.001045
6. Baron C, Zambbryski PC. The plant response in pathogenesis, symbiosis, and wounding: variations on a common theme? Annual Review of Genetics. 1995;29:107–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.000543
7. Glyan'ko AK, Ishchenko AA. Immunity of a leguminous plant infected by nodular bacteria Rhizobium spp. F.: review. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2017;53(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683817020107
8. Meilhoc E, Boscan A, Bruand C, Puppo A, Brouquisse R. Nitric oxide in legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Science. 2011;181(5):573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.04.007
9. Baudouin E, Pieuchot L, Engler G, Pauly N, Puppo A. Nitric oxide is formed in Medicago truncutula – Sinorhizobium meliloti functional nodules. Molecular plant-microbe Interactions. 2006;19(9):970–975. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0970
10. Herouart D, Baudouin E, Frendo P, Harrison J, Santos R, Jamet A, et al. Reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and glutathione: key role in the establishment of the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Plant physiology and biochemistry. 2002;40(6-8):619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01415-8
11. Meyer C, Lea US, Provan F, Kaizer WM, Lillo C. Is nitrate reductase a major player in the plant NO (nitric oxide) game? Photosynthesis research. 2005;83:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-004-3548-3
12. Lomovatskaya LA, Kuzakova OV, Romanenko AS, Goncharova AM. Activities of Adenylate Cyclase and Changes in cAMP Concentration in Root Cells of Pea Seedlings Infected with Mutualists and Phytopathogens. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2018;65(4):588–597. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443718030056
13. Kuzakova OV, Lomovatskaya LA, Goncharova AM, Romanenko AS. Effects of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strains different in their symbiotic effectiveness on changes in cAMP and hydrogen peroxide concentrations in cells of pea seedlings Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2019;66(5):712–717. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443719050121
14. Lomovatskaya LA, Romanenko AS, Filinova NV, Dudareva LV. Determination of cAMP in plant cells by a modified enzyme immunoassay method. Plant Cell Reports. 2011;30(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0950-5
15. Jones KM, Sharopova N, Lohar DP, Zhang JQ, VandenBosch KA, Walker GC. Diffe-rential response of the plant Medicago truncatula to its symbiont Sinorhizobium melliloti or an exopolysaccharide-deficient mutant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2008;105(2):704–709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709338105
16. Ferguson BJ, Indrasumunar A, Hayashi S, Lin Y-R, Lin Y-H, Reid DE, et al. Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2010;52:61–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00899.x
17. Gough C, Jacquet C. Nod factor perception protein carries weight in biotic interaction. Trends Plant Sciences. 2013;18(10)566–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.06.001
18. Glyan’ko АК. Phytohormones and nodulation at leguminous plants. Vestnik Khar'kovskogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universiteta. Seriya Biologiya = The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Biology. 2015;3:6–19. (In Russian)
19. Hichri I, Boscari A, Castella C, Rovere M, Puppo A, Brouquisse R. Nitric oxide: a multiface-ted regulator of the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Journal of experimental botany. 2015;66(10):2877–2887. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv051
20. Glyan'ko AK, Mitanova NB, Stepanov AV. Physiological role of nitric oxide (NO) at vegetative organisms. The Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry. 2009;5(3):33–52. (In Russian)
21. Courtois C, Besson A, Dahan J, Bourque S, Dobrowolska G, Alain P, et al. Nitric oxide signaling in plants: interplays with Ca2+ and protein kinases. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008;59(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm197
22. Jeandroz S, Lamotte O, Astier J, Rasul S, Trapet P, Besson-Bard A, et al. There’s more to the picture than meets the eye: nitric oxide cross talk with Ca2+ signaling. Plant Physiology. 2013;163(2):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.220624
23. Glyan'ko AK. Significance of Nod factors Rhizobium in induction of signaling systems at formation of legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Vestnik Khar'kovskogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universiteta. Seriya Biologiya = The Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Series Biology.2014;3:6–14. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Ishchenko A.A., Filinova N.V., Sidorov A.V. Effect of nodule and pathogenic bacteria on levels of nitric oxide and cyclic adenosine monophosphate in pea roots at initial stages of interaction. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2020;10(2):294-302. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2020-10-2-294-302
Views:
461
Email this article 