Effects of crude oil on the biological activity of chernozem soils

The article investigates the effect of crude oil on soil microorganisms and the enzymatic activity of chernozem soils. Experiments were carried out on podzolized medium loamy chernozem in the Samara region using high-sulphur crude oil of medium density. Per 1 kg of soil, 10.00 g (1%), 30.00 g (3%) and 50.00 g (5%) of oil were applied. According to the obtained results, the native soil microbiota contains a wide variety of microorganisms capable of oxidizing both individual hydrocarbons and crude oil in general. Bacteria of the Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Mycobacterium, Pseudomonas and Streptomyces genera, filamentous fungi of the Aspergillus and Penicillium genera, as well as Candida yeast showed the greatest activity in the degradation of both individual hydrocarbons and crude oil in general. The soils freshly polluted with oil demonstrated an increase in the number of bacteria that consume organic forms of nitrogen, actinomycetes, fungi and hydro-carbon-oxidizing microorganisms. In addition, a growing trend in the number of autochthonous microorganisms participating in the mineralization of humic substances was observed. Following 3 months of experiments, a decrease in the number of bacteria consuming organic forms of nitrogen and actinomycetes was revealed. The number of fungi showed the most pronounced decrease upon addition of 3 and 5% of oil, while the number of autochthonous microorganisms participating in the mineralization of humic substances and hydrocarbon-oxidizing microorganisms grew with an increase in the degree of oil pollution. Inhibition of various microorganisms by means of physical or toxic action of hydrocarbons contained in crude oil can cause a decrease in the activity of enzymes present in chernozem soils. Oil hydrocarbons inhibit the activity of polyphenol oxidase, catalase, invertase, phosphatase and lipase present in chernozem soils, although slightly stimulating the peroxidase activity. A decrease in the soil humification coefficient indicates that the oxidation of humic substances prevail over the decomposition of organic aromatic compounds into soil humus components, as well as a decrease in soil fertility as a result of its contamination with crude oil hydrocarbons.

1. Zamotaev IV, Nikonova AN, Ivanov IV, Mikheev PV. Chemical contamination and transformation of soils in hydrocarbon production regions. Eurasian Soil Science. 2015;48(12):1370-1382. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032180X1512014X

2. Gasanova UO. Influence of oil pollution on enzyme activity and cellulose-decomposing microorganisms in gray-drilled soil. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii zhurnal = International Research Magazine. 2019;3:52-58. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2019.81.3.007

3. Kireeva NA, Markarova MY, Shchemelinina TN, Rafikova GF. Enzimatic and microbiological activity oil-contaminated northern soils at different stages of their restorations. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Bashkir University. 2006;11 (4):56-58. (In Russian)

4. Isakova E.A. Features of influence of oil and oil products on soil biota. Colloquium-journal. 2019;12:4-6. (In Russian) https://doi.Org/10.24411/2520-6990-2019-10325

5. Bondar PN, Lekonceva IV. Environmental assessment of the condition cleared from oil pollution of forest soil with application of microorganisms. Khvoinye boreal'noi zony = Conifers of the boreal area. 2018;36(6):568-573. (In Russian)

6. Margesin R. Potential of cold-adapted microorganisms for bioremediation of oil-polluted Alpine soils. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2000;46(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00049-4

7. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.; 1994. 816 p.

8. Khaziev FKh. Methods of soil enzymology. Moscow: Nauka; 2005. 252 p. (In Russian)

9. Loginova OO, Dang TT, Belousova EV, Grabovich MYu. Application of the strains of the genus Acinetobacter for bioremediations of oil-polluted soils on the Voronezh region territory. Vestnik Voro-nezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Khimiya. Biologiya. Farmatsiya = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Chemistry. Biology. Pharmacy. 2011;2:127-133. (In Russian)

10. Tereshchenko NN, Loushnikov SV, Mitrofanova NA, Peelipenko SV. The featured of biological restoration of oily and technogenically salted soils. Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii = Ecology and industry of Russia. 2005;6;33-36. (In Russian)

11. Peressutti SR, Alvarez HM, Pucci OH. Dynamics of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteriocenosis of an experimental oil pollution in Patagonian soil. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2003;52(1):21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00102-6

12. Parkhomenko AN, Stognieva АА. Evaluation of the state of soils using microbiological indicators in the antropogenic impact. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2017;12:90-93. (In Russian)

13. Chernykh NA, Baeva YuI. Changes in the number and species of bacteria in oil-polluted soils. Ekologicheskaya khimiya. 2018;27(5):246-252. (In Russian)

14. Zvyagintsev DG (ed.) Microorganisms and preservation of bedrocks. Moscow: Moscow State University Publishing house; 1989. 206 р. (In Russian)

15. Wolicka D, Suszek A, Borkowski A, Bielecka A. Application of aerobic microorganisms in bioremediation in situ of soil contaminated by petroleum products. Bioresource Technology. 2009;100(13):3221-3227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.020

16. Kiss S, Dragan-Bularda M, Pasca D. Enzymology of the recultivation of technogenic soils. Advances in Agronomy. 1989;42:229-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60526-X

17. Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F. Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities. Chemosphere. 2000;40(4):339-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00218-0

18. Andreoni V, Cavalca L, Rao MA, Nocerino G, Bernasconi S, Dell’Amico E, et al. Bacterial communities and enzyme activities of PAHs polluted soils. Chemosphere. 2004;57(5):401-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.013

19. Emtiazi G, Abbasi S. Effect of DSO on microbial flora of soil. Isfahan University Research Journal. 2006;74:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2008.01.005

20. Margesin R, Walder G, Schinner F. The impact of hydrocarbon remediation (diesel oil and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) on enzyme activities and microbial properties of soil. Acta Biotechnologi-ca. 2000;20(3-4):313-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/abio.370200312

21. Marin JA, Hernandez T, Garcia C. Bioremediation of oil refinery sludge by landfarming in semi-arid conditions: Influence on soil microbial activity. Environmental Research. 2005;98(2):185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.06.005

22. Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresource Technology. 2000; 74(1):63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00144-3

23. Ruberto L, Vazquez SC, Mac Cormack WP. Effectiveness of the natural bacterial flora of a hydrocarbon contaminated Antarctic soil. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2003;52(2): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00048-9

24. Greene EA, Kay JG, Jaber K, Stehmeier LG, Voordouw G. Composition of soil microbial communities enriched on a mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(12):5282-5289. https://doi.org/10.1128%2Faem.66.12.5282-5289.2000