Possibilities of using information resources In bioremediation
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2021-11-3-372-383
Abstract
Abstract: Bioremediation using microorganisms has a number of advantages over physical and chemical methods of water, soil and atmosphere purification. Microorganisms have a wide range of metabolic capabilities that enable them to convert, modify and utilize toxic pollutants for energy and biomass production. This article shows their participation in the decomposition of various industrial wastes, such as dyes, hydrocarbons, chlorinated aromatic compounds and pesticides, among others. Although the use of microorganisms is an environmentally friendly and promising way of solving environmental threats, many factors affect the effectiveness of bioremediation, such as the chemical nature of pollutants, their accessibility to microorganisms, the physical and chemical characteristics of the environment, as well as the interaction of the destructive organisms with each other. The search for new effective strains or the creation of superdestructors using genetic and protein engineering methods proves to be crucial under current circumstances. This task can be solved using such “tools” as genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics. These technologies require the integration of a huge amount of data, which cannot be achieved without the use of bioinformatics. Bioinformatics is used in microbial bioremediation in different ways: analysis of genome sequencing data, identification of protein-coding genes, comparative analysis to identify the function of unknown genes, automatic reconstruction and comparison of metabolic pathways, and study of protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions to understand regulatory mechanisms. This review aims to highlight various resources that store information about possible pathways of microbial metabolism involved in the biodegradation of petroleum products. The use of such information resources can become a starting point for many studies in bioremediation.
About the Authors
E. V. Babynin
Kazan Federal University; Tatar Research Institute of Agrochemistry and Soil Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Edward V. Babynin, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher
18, Kremlevskaya St., Kazan, 420008
20а, Orenburgskii trakt, Kazan, 420059
I. A. Degtyareva
Kazan Federal University; Kazan National Research Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Degtyareva, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, Chief Researcher; Professor
20а, Orenburgskii trakt, Kazan, 420059
68, Karl Marx St., Kazan, 420015
References
1. Ellis LBM, Roe D, Wackett LP. Biodegradation Database: the first decade. Nucleic Acids Research. 2006;34:D517–D521. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj076
2. Arora PK, Shi W. Tools of bioinformatics in biodegradation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2010;9:211–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-010-9211-x
3. Gao J, Ellis LBM, Wackett LP. The university of Minnesota biocatalysis/biodegradation database: improving public access. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:D488-D491. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp771
4. Degtyareva IA, Yapparov IA, Yapparov AKh, Ezhkova AM, Davletshina AY, Shaydullina IA. Creation and application of biofertilizers based on the effective consortium destructor microorganisms for remediation of contaminated soils of the Republic of Tatarstan. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo. 2017;5:100–103. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2017-5-100-103
5. Costa AS, Romão LPC, Araújo BR, Lucas SCO, Maciel STA, Wisniewski A Jr., et al. Environmental strategies to remove volatile aromatic fractions (BTEX) from petroleum industry wastewater using biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2012;105:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.096
6. Chandra S, Sharma R, Singh K, Sharma A. Application of bioremediation technology in the environment contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon. Annals of Microbiology. 2013;63(2):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0543-3
7. Souza EC, Vessoni-Penna TC, de Souza Oliveira RP. Biosurfactant-enhanced hydrocarbon bioremediation: an overview. International Biodeterioration & Biodeg89:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.01.007radation. 2014;
8. Shaidullina IA, Yapparov AKh, Degtyareva IA, Latypova VZ, Gadieva ESh. Recultivation of oilcontaminated lands by example of leached black humus earth of Tatarstan. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo = Oil industry. 2015;3:102–105. (In Russian)
9. Degtyareva IA, Babynin EV, Motina TYu, Sultanov MI. Full-genome sequencing of the Staphylococcus warneri strain isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Izvestiya Vuzov. Prikladnaya Khimiya i Biotekhnologiya = Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2020;10(1):48-55. (In English) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2020-10-1-48-55
10. Abatenh E, Gizaw B, Tsegaye Z, Wassie M. The role of microorganisms in bioremediation. Open Journal of Environmental Biology. 2017;1(1):038–046. https://doi.org/10.17352/ojeb.000007
11. Bhandari S, Poudel DK, Marahatha R, Dawadi S, Khadayat K, Phuyal S, et al. Microbial enzymes used in bioremediation. Journal of Chemistry. 2021;2021(4). Article ID 8849512. 17 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8849512
12. Abou Seeda MA, Yassen AA, Abou El-Nour EZAA. Microorganism as a tool of bioremediation technology for cleaning waste and industrial water. Bioscience Research. 2017;14(3):633–644.
13. Dave S, Das J. Role of microbial enzymes for biodegradation and bioremediation of environmental pollutants: challenges and future prospects. In: Bioremediation for Environmental Sustainability. Saxena G, Kumar V, Shah MP. (eds.) Elsevier; 2021, p. 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820524-2.00013-4
14. Singh P, Jain R, Srivastava N, Borthakur A, Pal DB, Singh R, et al. Current and emerging trends in bioremediation of petrochemical waste: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;47(3):155–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1318616
15. Ghaly AE, Yusran A, Dave D. Effects of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on the degradation of pyrene in soil. Journal of Bioremediation & Biode- gradation. 2013. S7:005. 13 p. https://doi.org/-10.4172/2155-6199.S7-005
16. Koshlaf E, Ball AS. Soil bioremediation approaches for petroleum hydrocarbon polluted environments. AIMS Microbiology. 2017;3(1):25–49. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.25
17. Dvořák P, Nikel PI, Damborský J, de Lorenzo V. Bioremediation 3.0: engineering pollutantremoving bacteria in the times of systemic biology. Biotechnology Advances. 2017;35(7):845–866. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.08.001
18. Chandran H, Meena M, Sharma K. Microbial biodiversity and bioremediation assessment through omics approaches. Frontiers Environmental Chemistry. 2020;1:570326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2020.570326
19. Jesmok EM, Hopkins JM, Foran DR. Nextgeneration sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene for forensic soil comparison: a feasibility study. Journal Forensic Sciences. 2016;61(3):607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13049
20. Rahmeh R, Akbar A, Kumar V, Al-Mansour H, Kishk M, Ahmed N, et al. Insights into bacterial community involved in bioremediation of aged oilcontaminated soil in arid environment. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2021;17. 13 p.
21. Misra BB, Langefeld CD, Olivier M, Cox LA. Integrated omics: tools, advances, and future approaches. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2018;62(1): R21–R45. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-18-0055
22. Pandey A, Tripathi PH, Tripathi AH, Pandey SC, Gangola S. Omics technology to study bioremediation and respective enzymes. In: Smart bioremediation technologies. Microbial enzymes. Bhatt P. (ed.). New Delhi: Academic Press; 2019, p. 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818307-6.00002-0
23. Singh AK, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Raj A. Trends in predictive biodegradation for sustainable mitigation of environmental pollutants: recent progress and future outlook. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;770:144561. H ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144561
24. Goh H-H. Integrative multi-omics through bioinformatics. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2018;1102:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98758-3_5
25. Ejigu GF, Jung J. Review on the computational genome annotation of sequences obtained by next-generation sequencing. Biology. 2020;9(9):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090295
26. Zhang P, Berardini TZ, Ebert D, Li Q, Mi H, Muruganujan A, et al. PhyloGenes: An online phylogenetics and functional genomics resource for plant gene function inference. Plant Direct. 2020;4(12): e00293. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.293
27. Tong H, Phan NVT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen DV, Vo NS, Le L. Review on databases and bioinformatic approaches on pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. 2021;14:61–75. https://doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S290781
28. Caspi R, Altman T, Billington R, Dreher K, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;42:D459–D471. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1103
29. Mohan C.G., Gandhi T., Garg D., Shinde R. Computer-assisted methods in chemical toxicity prediction // Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2007. Vol. 7. Issue 5. P. 499–507. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955707780619554
30. Mohan CG, Gandhi T, Garg D, Shinde R. Computer- assisted methods in chemical toxicity prediction. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2007;7(5):499–507. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955707780619554
31. Chou CH, Chang WC, Chiu СС, Huang СС, Huang HD. FMM: a web server for metabolic pathway reconstruction and comparative analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37:W129–W134. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp264
32. Finley SD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Computational framework for predictive biodegradation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2009;104(6):1086–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22489
33. Moriya Y, Shigemizu D, Hattori M, Tokimatsu T, Kotera M, Goto S, et al. PathPred: an enzyme-catalyzed metabolic pathway prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:W138–W143. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq318
34. Gao J, Ellis LBM, Wackett LP. The University of Minnesota pathway prediction system: multilevel prediction and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39(Web Server issue);W406–W411. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr200
35. Kotera M, Goto S. Metabolic pathway reconstruction strategies for central metabolism and natural product biosynthesis. Biophysics & Physicobiology. 2016;13:195–205. https://doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.13.0_195
36. Shah HA, Liu J, Yang Z, Feng J. Review of machine learning methods for the prediction and reconstruction of metabolic pathways. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2021;8:634141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.634141
37. Wang L, Dash S, Ng CY, Maranas CD. A review of computational tools for design and reconstruction of metabolic pathways. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology. 2017;2(4):243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2017.11.002
38. Wackett L.P. The Metabolic Pathways of Biodegradation. In: The prokaryotes. Applied Bacteriology and Biotechnology. 4th ed. Rosenberg E. (editor-in-chief); DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. (eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2013, p. 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31331-8_76
39. Dombrowski N, Donaho JA, Gutierrez T, Seitz KW, Teske AP, Baker BJ. Reconstructing metabolic pathways of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Nature Microbiology. 2016;1(7). Article number 16057. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.57
40. Jaiswal S, Shukla P. Alternative strategies for microbial remediation of pollutants via synthetic biology. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00808
41. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Steven RL. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nature Biotechnology. 2010;28:977–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1672
42. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017;45(D1):D353–D361. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1092
43. Caspi R, Billington R, Ferrer L, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44(D1):D471–D480. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1164
44. Rentzsch R, Orengo C.A. Protein function prediction – the power of multiplicity. Trends in Biotechnology. 2009;27(4):210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.01.002
45. Calderón-González KG, Hernández-Monge J, Herrera-Aguirre ME, Luna-Arias JP. Bioinformatics Tools for Proteomics Data Interpretation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2016;919:281– 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41448-5_16
46. Oliveira JS, Araújo W, Lopes Sales AI, de Brito Guerra A, da Silva Araújo SC, de Vasconcelos ATR, et al. BioSurfDB: knowledge and algorithms to support biosurfactants and biodegradation studies. Database. The Journal of Biology Databases and Curation. 2015:2015: bav 033. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav033
47. Medema MH, van Raaphorst R, Takano E, Breitling R. Computational tools for the synthetic design of biochemical pathways. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2012;10(3):191–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2717
48. Hadadi N, Hatzimanikatis V. Design of computational retrobiosynthesis tools for the design of de novo synthetic pathways. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2015;28:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.06.025
49. Langowski J, Long A. Computer systems for the prediction of xenobiotic metabolism. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2002;54(3):407–415. https: //doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00011-x
50. Wicker J, Lorsbach T, Gütlein M, Schmid E, Latino D, Kramer S, et al. EnviPath – the environmental contaminant biotransformation pathway resource. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44(D1):D502–D508. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1229
51. Pazos F, Guijas D, Valencia A, de Lorenzo V. MetaRouter: bioinformatics for bioremediation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:D588–D592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki068
Review
For citations:
Babynin E.V., Degtyareva I.A. Possibilities of using information resources In bioremediation. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2021;11(3):372-383. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2021-11-3-372-383
Views:
417
Email this article 