Preview

Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology

Advanced search

Evolution of views on plant immunity: from Flor’s “gene-for-gene” theory to the “zig-zag model” developed by Jones and Dangl

https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2020-10-3-424-438

Abstract

The study of plant defence mechanisms in response to pathogens in the mid-20th century resulted in Harold Flor’s gene-for-gene interaction hypothesis, which became recognised as central to the study of phytoimmunity. According to this theory, the outcome of interactions in plant – pathogen phytopathosystems – i.e. compatibility or incompatibility – is controlled genetically in interacting organisms and determined by the presence of specific genes in both pathogen and plant: resistance genes in the plant and avirulence genes in pathogen. The latest achievements in phytoimmunology, obtained with the help of modern molecular biology and bioinformatics methods, have made a significant contribution to the classical understanding of plant immunity and provided grounds for a modern concept of phytoimmunity consisting in the “zig-zag model” developed by Jonathan Jones and Jefferey Dangl. Plant immunity is currently understood as being determined by an innate multi-layer immune system involving various structures and mechanisms of specific and non-specific immunity. Recognition by plant membrane receptors of conservative molecular patterns associated with microorganisms, as well as molecules produced during cell wall disruption by pathogen hydrolytic enzymes forms a basic non-specific immune response in the plant. Detection of pathogen effector molecules by plant intra-cellular receptors triggers a specific effector-triggered immunity, resulting in the development of the hypersensitive response, systemic resistance and immune memory of the plant. Virulence factors and pathogen attack strategies on the one hand, and mechanisms of plant immune protection on the other, are the result of one form of constant co-evolution, often termed an “evolutionary arms race”. This paper discusses the main principles of Flor's classical “gene-for-gene interaction” theory as well as the molecular-genetic processes of plant innate immunity, their mechanisms and participants in light of contemporary achievements in phytoimmunology.

About the Authors

T. N. Shafikova
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Tat'yana N. Shafikova, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Scientist 

132, Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664033



Yu. V. Omelichkina
Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry SB RAS
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Omelichkina, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Engineer 

132, Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664033



References

1. Flor HH. Inheritance of reaction to rust in flax. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1947;74:241–262.

2. Janeway C, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:197–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359

3. Lebedev KA, Ponyakina ID. Immunology of image-recognizing receptors. Integral immunology. Moscow: URSS; 2009. 253 p. (In Russian)

4. Zhang J, Zhou J-M. Plant immunity triggered by microbial molecular signatures. Molecular Plant. 2010;3(5):783–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq035

5. Jones JDG, Vance RE, Dangl JL. Intracellular innate immune surveillance devices in plants and animals. Science. 2016;354(6316):aaf6395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6395

6. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444(7117):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286

7. D’yakov YT. Fifty years of “gene-for-gene” theory. Uspekhi sovremennoi biologii = Advances in Current Biology. 1996;116:293-305. (In Russian)

8. Staskawicz B, Ausubel E, Baker B, Ellis JG, Jones JD. Molecular genetic of plant disease resistance. Science. 1995;268(5211):661–666. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7732374

9. Vavilov NI. Plant immunity to infection diseases. Moscow: Nauka; 1986. 519 p. (In Russian)

10. Albersheim P, Anderson-Proyty AJ. Carbohydrates, proteins, cell surfaces, and the biochemistry of pathogenesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1975;26:31–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.000335

11. Robatzek S, Saijo Y. Plant immunity from A to Z. Genome Biology. 2008;9(4). Article 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-4-304

12. Bednarek P. Chemical warfare or modulators of defense responses-the function of secondary metabolites in plant immunity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2012;15(4):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.002

13. Janeway CA. Autoimmune disease: immunotherapy by peptides? Nature. 1989;341(6242):48 2–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/341482a0

14. Staal J, Dixelius C. Tracing the ancient origins of plant innate immunity. Trends Plant Science. 2007;12(8):334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.014

15. Lotze MT, Zeh HJ, Rubartelli A, Sparvero LJ, Amoscato AA, Washburn NR, et al. The grateful dead: damage associated molecular pattern molecules and reduction/oxidation regulate immunity. Immunological Reviews. 2007;220(1):60–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00579.x

16. Couto D, Zipfel C. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2016;16:537–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.77

17. Vance RE, Isberg RR, Portnoy DA. Patterns of pathogenesis: discrimination of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microbes by the innate immune system. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6(1):10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2009.06.007

18. Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2004; 42:185–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421

19. Slaughter A, Daniel X, Flors V, Luna E, Hohn B, Mauch-Mani B. Descendants of primed Arabidopsis plants exhibit enhanced resistance to biotic stress. Plant Physiology. 2012;158:835–843. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.191593

20. Omelichkina YV, Shafikova TN, Alekseyenko AL, Markova YA, Yenikeyev AG, Rikhvanov EG. Response of tobacco plants and cell cultures to infection by Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. Sepedonicus. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii = In the World of Scientific Achievements. 2010;1-4:89–94. (In Russian)

21. Markova YA, Savilov ЕD, Anganova ЕV, Voinikov VK. Natural environment as a potential habitat of pathogenic and potentially pathogenic enterobacteria. Irkutsk: State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; 2013. 144 p. (In Russian)

22. Dow M, Newman MA, von Roepenack E. The induction and modulation of plant defense response by bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2000;38:241–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.241

23. Nicaise V, Roux M, Zipfel C. Recent advances in PAMP-triggered immunity against bacteria: pattern recognition receptors watch over and raise the alarm. Plant physiology. 2009;150:1638–1647. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.139709

24. Sakamoto T, Deguchi M, Brustolini O, Santos A, Silva F, Fontes E. The tomato RLK superfamily: phylogeny and functional predictions about the role of the LRRII-RLK subfamily in antiviral defense. BMC Plant Biology. 2012;12:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-229

25. Li L, Yu Y, Zhou Z, Zhou JM. Plant patternrecognition receptors controlling innate immunity. Science China Life Sciences. 2016;59:878–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-0115-2

26. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2001;98(19):10763–10768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181141598

27. Kopp E, Medzhitov R. Recognition of microbial infection by Toll-like receptors. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2003;15(4):396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-7915(03)00080-3

28. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of patternrecognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nature Immunology. 2010;11: 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1863

29. Dardick C, Ronald P. Plant and animal pathogen recognition receptors signal through non-RD kinases. PLoS Pathogens. 2006;2.(1):0014–0028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020002

30. Lee S-W, Han S-W, Sririyanum M, Park C-J, Seo Y-S, Ronald PC. A type I-secreted, sulfated peptide triggers XA21-mediated innate immunity. Science. 2009;326(5954):850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173438

31. Kunze G, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Niehaus K, Boller T, Felix G. The N terminus of bacterial elongation factor Tu elicits innate immunity in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell. 2004;16:3496–3507. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.026765

32. Miya A, Albert P, Shinya T, Desaki Y, Ichimura K, Shirasu K, et al. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signalling in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2007;104(49):19613–19618. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705147104

33. Liu B, Li J-F, Ao Y, Qu J, Li Z, Su J, et al. Lysin motif-containing proteins LYP4 and LYP6 play dual roles in peptidoglycan and chitin perception in rice innate immunity. Plant Cell. 2012;24:3406–3419. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102475

34. Ranf S, Gisch N, Schäffer M, Illig T, Westphal L, Knirel YA, et al. A lectin S-domain receptor kinase mediates lipopolysaccharide sensing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Immunology. 2015;16(4): 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3124

35. Brutus A, Sicilia F, Macone A, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G. A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wallassociated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2010;107(20):9452–9457. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000675107

36. Forrest RS, Lyon GD. Substrate degradation patterns of polygalacturonic acid lyase from Erwinia carotovora and Bacillus polymyxa and release of phytoalexin-eliciting oligosaccharides from potato cell walls. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1990;41(4):481–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/41.4.481

37. Anderson CM, Wagner TA, Perret M, He Z-H, He D, Kohorn BD. WAKs: cell wall-associated kinases linking the cytoplasm to the extracellular matrix. Plant Molecular Biology. 2001;47:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010691701578

38. Schulze B, Mentzel T, Jehle AK, Mueller K, Beeler S, Boler T, et al. Rapid heteromerization and phosphorylation of ligand-activated plant transmembrane receptors and their associated kinase BAK1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(13):944 4–9451. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.096842

39. Sun Y, Li L, Macho AP, Han Z, Hu Z, Zipfel C, et al. Structural basis for flg22-induced activation of the Arabidopsis FLS2-BAK1 immune complex. Science. 2013;342(6158):624–628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243825

40. Wang Y, Li Z, Liu D, Xu J, Wei X, Yan L, et al. Assessment of BAK1 activity in different plant receptor-like kinase complexes by quantitative profiling of phosphorylation patterns. Journal of Proteomics. 2014;108:484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.06.009

41. Shan L, He P, Li J, Heese A, Peck SC, Nürnberger T, et al. Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.017

42. Belkhadir Y, Jaillais Y, Epple P, Balsemao-Pires E, Dangl JL, Chory J. Brassinosteroids modulate the efficiency of plant immune responses to microbe-associated molecular patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2012;10(1):297–302. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112840108

43. Liu J, Ding P, Sun T, Nitta Y, Dong O, Huang X, et al. Heterotrimeric G proteins serve as a converging point in plant defense signaling activated by multiple receptor-like kinases. Plant Physiology. 2013;161:2146–2158. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.212431

44. Ren D, Liu Y, Yang K-Y, Han L, Mao G, Glazebrook J, et al. A fungal-responsive MAPK cascade regulates phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2008;105(14):5638–5643. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711301105

45. Bi G, Zhou J-M. MAP kinase signaling pathways: a hub of plantmicrobe interactions. Cell Host and Microbe. 2017;21(3):270–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.02.004

46. Pandey SP, Somssich IE. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiology. 2009;150(4):1648–1655. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.138990

47. Ishihama N, Yoshioka H. Post-translational regulation of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2012;15(4):431–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.02.003

48. Adachi H, Nakano T, Miyagawa N, Ishihama N, Yoshioka M, Katou Y, et al. WRKY transcription factors phosphorylated by MAPK regulate a plant immune NADPH oxidase in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell. 2015;27(9):2645–2663. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00213

49. Dong J, Chen C, Chen Z. Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Molecular Biology. 2003;51:21–37. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020780022549

50. Talanova VV, Titov AF, Topchiyeva LV, Malysheva IE, Venzhik YV, Frolova SA. Expression of genes of WRKY transcription factor and stress proteins in wheat plants under cold hardening and ABA impact. Fiziologiya rastenii = Plant Physiology. 2009;56(5):776–782. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144370

51. Wei W, Zhang Y, Han L, Guan Z, Chai T. A novel WRKY transcriptional factor from Thlaspi caerulescens negatively regulates the osmotic stress tolerance of transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Reports. 2008;27:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0499-0

52. Tsuda K, Sato M, Glazebrook J, Cohen JD, Katagiri F. Interplay between MAMP triggered and SA-mediated defense responses. The Plant Journal. 2008;53:763–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03369.x

53. Withers J, Dong X. Post-translational regulation of plant immunity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2017;38:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.05.004

54. Segonzac C, Macho AP, Sanmartin M, Ntoukakis V, Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Zipfel C. Negative control of BAK1 by protein phosphatase 2A during plant innate immunity. The EMBO Journal. 2014;33(18):2069–2079. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201488698

55. Couto D, Niebergall R, Liang X, Bucherl CA, Sklenar J., Macho AP, et al. The Arabidopsis protein phosphatase PP2C38 negatively regulates the central immune kinase BIK1. PLoS Pathogens. 201;12:1005811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005811

56. Zhou J, Lu D, Xu G, Finlayson SA, He P, Shan L. The dominant negative ARM domain uncovers multiple functions of PUB13 in Arabidopsis immunity, flowering, and senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66(11):3353–3366. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv148

57. Smith JM, Salamango DJ, Leslie ME, Collins CA, Heese A. Sensitivity to Flg22 is modulated by ligand-induced degradation and de novo synthesis of the endogenous flagellin-receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING2. Plant Physiology. 2014;164:440–454. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.229179

58. Katagiri F, Tsuda K. Understanding the plant immune system. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2010;23(12):1531–1536. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-10-0099

59. Zhang J, Shao F, Cui H, Chen L, Li H, Zou Y, et al. A Pseudomonas syringae effector inactivates MAPKs to suppress PAMP-induced immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;1(3):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.03.006

60. Macho AP, Schwessinger B, Ntoukakis V, Brutus A, Segonzac C, Roy S, et al. A bacterial tyrosine phosphatase inhibits plant pattern recognition receptor activation. Science. 2014;343(6178):1509–1512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248849

61. Zeng L, Velasquez AC, Munkvold KR, Zhang J, Martin GB. A tomato LysM receptor-like kinase promotes immunity and its kinase activity is inhibited by AvrPtoB. The Plant Journal. 2012;69:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04773.x

62. Hemetsberger C, Herrberger C, Zechmann B, Hillmer M, Doehlemann G. The Ustilago maydis effector Pep1 suppresses plant immunity by inhibition of host peroxidase activity. PLOS Pathogens. 2012;8:e1002684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002684

63. Lukasik E, Takken F.L. STANDing strong, resistance proteins instigators of plant defence. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2009;12(4):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.03.001

64. Kadota Y, Shirasu K, Guerois R. NLR sensors meet at the SGT1-HSP90 crossroad. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2010;35(4):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.12.005

65. Dangl JL, Jones JDG. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411:826–833. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081161

66. Wilton M, Subramaniam R, Elmore J, Felsensteiner C, Coaker G, Desveaux D. The type III effector HopF2 Pto targets Arabidopsis RIN4 protein to promote Pseudomonas syringae virulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2010;107(5):2349–2354. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904739107

67. Van der Hoorn RA, Kamoun S. From guard to decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.060194

68. Gutierrez JR, Balmuth AL, Ntoukakis V, Mucyn TS, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Jones A, et al. Prf immune complexes of tomato are oligomeric and contain multiple Pto-like kinases that diversify effector recognition. The Plant Journal. 2009;61(3):507–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04078.x

69. Collier SM, Moffett P. NB-LRRs work a “bait and switch” on pathogens. Trends in Plant Sciences. 2009;14(10):521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.001

70. Wirthmueller L, Zhang Y, Jones JD, Parker JE. Nuclear accumulation of the Arabidopsis immune receptor RPS4 is necessary for triggering EDS1-dependent defense. Current Biology. 2007;17(23):2023–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.042

71. Bai S, Liu J, Chang C, Zhang L, Maekawa T, Wang Q, et al. Structure-function analysis of barley NLR immune receptor MLA10 reveals its cell compartment specific activity in cell death and disease resistance. PLoS Pathogens. 2012;8(6):e1002752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002752

72. Sarris PF, Duxbury Z, Huh SU, Ma Y, Segonzac C, Sklenar J, et al. A plant immune receptor detects pathogen effectors that target WRKY transcription factors. Cell. 2015;161(5):1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.024

73. Mur LA, Kenton P, Lloyd AJ, Ougham H, Prats E. The hypersensitive response: the centenary is upon us but how much do we know? Journal of Experemental Botany. 2008;59(3):501–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm239

74. Jwa N-S, Hwang BK. Convergent evolution of pathogen effectors toward reactive oxygen species signaling networks in plants front. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01687

75. Le Roux C, Huet G, Jauneau A, Camborde L, Tremousaygue D, Kraut A, et al. A receptor pair with an integrated decoy converts pathogen disabling of transcription factors to immunity. Cell. 2015;161(5):1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.025


Review

For citations:


Shafikova T.N., Omelichkina Yu.V. Evolution of views on plant immunity: from Flor’s “gene-for-gene” theory to the “zig-zag model” developed by Jones and Dangl. Proceedings of Universities. Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2020;10(3):424-438. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2925-2020-10-3-424-438

Views: 1861


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-2925 (Print)
ISSN 2500-1558 (Online)